125778
EconPapers FAQ Archive maintainers FAQ Cookies at EconPapers Format for printing The RePEc blog The RePEc plagiarism page User experience of two different LMS: effects on students' performance and recommendations for contents designGalena PisoniInternational Journal of Management and Enterprise Development, 2022, vol. 21, issue 3, 263-278Abstract:The aim of this work is to understand the effects of user experience on students' outcomes in two different learning management systems (LMS), Moodle and Sakai, on the same entrepreneurship education task in both environments. We developed an online learning setting where technical graduate students practice and gain knowledge on innovation and entrepreneurship themes and we evaluate which LMS provided better user experience. The evaluation included 70 students in total, 37 in the Moodle condition and 33 in Sakai condition. Results indicated that the students in the Moodle condition reported to have slightly better learning experience compared to the students in Sakai condition. The follow-up interviews with the students highlighted positive and negative experiences related to features and options of the different platforms, their influence on student learning, and the different ways to organise contents in them. The qualitative feedback suggests learners want an affective connection with the contents and demand for high quality of learning materials. These data provide empirical evidence of the learning gains offered by the two different LMS and provide practical guidelines for education designers on how to design education experiences on both of the platforms.Keywords: online education; education delivery; user experience; learning management system; LMS; Moodle; Sakai. (search for similar items in EconPapers)Date: 2022References: Add references at CitEc Citations: Track citations by RSS feedDownloads: (external link) =125778 (text/html)Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.Related works:This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/TextPersistent link: :ids:ijmede:v:21:y:2022:i:3:p:263-278Access Statistics for this articleMore articles in International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development from Inderscience Enterprises LtdBibliographic data for series maintained by Sarah Parker (Obfuscate( 'inderscience.com', 'informationadministrator5' )). var addthis_config = "data_track_clickback":true; var addthis_share = url:" :ids:ijmede:v:21:y:2022:i:3:p:263-278"Share This site is part of RePEc and all the data displayed here is part of the RePEc data set. Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute. Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to Obfuscate( 'oru.se', 'econpapers' ). EconPapers is hosted by the Örebro University School of Business.
125778
N1 - Funding Information:This work was supported in part by NIH grants R01AI127744 (T.W.), R01 NS125778 (T.W). C.L. was a recipient of a summer internship from NIAID T35 training grant (AI078878, PI: T.W.).Publisher Copyright: 2023 by the authors. 041b061a72